Instructional Style, Martial Method

METHOD OF INSTRUCTIONto the more single-minded instructors for what
"Ichí! Ni! San! Yamae! Ichí! Ni! San!they had contributed to my knowledge of
Mawatte! Ichí! Ni! San!" Stop! Turn! But doinstruction. I knew that each specialty helped me
not twitch! Repeat, repeat, repeat! There hasbetter understand an aspect of my wider view of
never been a more tried and true method ofthe arts.
drilling instant reaction than obeying a command. ItI also studied the history of all the arts, especially
produces, in most cases, disciplined students withmy own Japanese arts, to discover which
honed reflexes.traditions were relative to contemporary training
Close your eyes and think of yourself surroundedand which were outmoded. If I were to judge
by four assailants. When you open them again,other methods of teaching, if I were to alter my
fight off the assailants all at once but in slowown, I wanted to do so with a logical argument.
motion as if in a movie. Special drills put studentsSince so many approaches were consciously
in different circumstances to broaden the type oftraditional or anti-traditional, it was the root of the
reactions they can have and to develop skillstraditions which I wished to understand. The
within them.following segment is what I discovered about the
Consider the use of the latissimus dorsi muscles.instructional history of my own arts.
They lock your arm into the mass of your body,STYLE OF TRAINING
so it is important to flex these muscles byThe ryu was a martial tradition perpetrated by a
dropping your shoulders when punching. Analysesbloodline inheritance (sei) or by a non-genetically
of movements make students better able torelated one (dai). The establishment of ryu was
correct themselves and better able to teachalways attributed to divine guidance, which gave
others.its founder a sudden insight during his years of
Even within a specific style of a specific art, therearduous practice. Thus ryu are naturally given to
can be as many methods of instruction as theremysticism and to making their students learn
are schools. Three general methods seem tothrough insight and hard practice, rather than
summarize them however:through rational teaching. I term this the
1. the traditional method (usually based onìzen method.
repetition) is the most prevalent;Spiritual aspects of old bu-jutsu (warrior skills)
2. the creative method (which invents newbecame emphasized in classical budo (martial way).
exercises to perfect a skill or teach a principle);"One strike, one life" was the essence of classical
andbudo. It means that spiritually the warrior must
3. the intellectual method (based on verbalwield his weapon, make his strike as if his life not
explanation and rational understanding).just depended on it, but was to be sacrificed with
Some instructors just inherit their method as if itit. Thus kyudo (archery) places the emphasis on
were part of the style itself. Others seek out orhow the bow is to be drawn, not on whether the
stumble upon different methods which morearrow hits the target. Kata in karate, judo, and
efficiently help them reach their goals. In order tokendo emphasize exact form, not immediate
consciously choose a method of teaching,effectiveness. JKA (Japan Karate Association)
instructors must state their goals, at least tokarate looks for one-punch kill, not combat
themselves. They must have a picture of whatgive-and-take. This style is totally Japanese in its
they want to accomplish, the ideal student.spiritual aspect even though it descends from an
Depending on the makeup of this ideal, eachOkinawan lineage which was much more practical
instructor may favor one of the three methodsin its view of fighting. Thus certain karate kamae
over the others.(postures) become purposeless combatively in an
When I first began studying judo, no oneeffort to visually represent the spirit of the
questioned the method of teaching. The methodwarrior. Classical budo's main emphasis is spiritual
and the art were considered synonymous. TheThe method of teaching this spiritual state, and
art was "ancient" Japanese (we were not awarethus enlightenment, is the zen method: intuition
that it was less than 100 years old at that time),through imitation. Supposedly, imitation is
so the method must be similarly Japanese and"body-learning" rather than "mind-learning" and thus
ancient. Long periods of exercises and falling werelasts longer. Certainly, some things we learn
followed by a longer period of uchikomi (simulatedrationally pass right through us; but, things we
throws or "fit-ins") or occasionally sute-geikolearn physically, like bike riding, are never
(exchange-throwing practice). Then, as if we wereforgotten. However, what is lacking in the imitation
not exhausted enough, randori (free style). Forlearning style are those things which are needed
fifteen or twenty minutes somewhere in thefor a combatively effective fighting art:
practice, Sensei would show and we would1. the zen method is slow;
practice a new throw or new approach to an old2. it requires the trainee to constantly re-learn
throw, but 90% of our work was sweat andtechniques which were falsely imitated initially;
repetition. We were in terrific shape, muscularly3. although it greatly heightens the powers of
and aerobically, but everybody seemed to useobservation, it reduces the powers of analysis;
the same three or four throws. The method ofthe practitioner is given to perfecting his/her own
teaching had all by ordained it.form but cannot analyze what is wrong with
My first traditional ju-jutsu class had little to dosomeone else's even though he/she may in fact
with sweat but a lot to do with patience. Werecognize the flaw;
knelt down facing each other and practiced a4. the practical purposes of all forms are lost
basic wrist release for 20 to 30 minutes. No onegradually and, if retained, cannot be modified to
explained why; no one taught how. Then wetake into account a different opponent, nor can
stood up and sensei taught a new move bythey be changed to make them more effective.
demonstrating it four times (two right-side andIn short, the zen method dispenses with idea of
two left-side) with his uke. We tried to imitate. Noprinciples (since they are rational) and of
one was to talk. Sensei never taught anythingeffectiveness (since this goal is non-spiritual).
verbally. If we were doing it completely wrong, heBut there are also advantages to the zen method
would step in and demonstrate again with one ofof training. Zen teaching attempts to overcome
us, usually once. This went on for another 30 tothe ego (for this read "egotism") by having its
40 minutes. With only some falling practice addeddisciple become self-centered, thus ignoring
for spice, that was the entire workout. Therecomparisons with others. Too much reliance on
was a method but little actual teaching.combative method produces the "competitive
Initially my karate teacher ran a class that was asmind" which is a positive thing to have in combat,
traditional as the ju-jutsu class had been: nobut can be self-destructive since it leaves the
talking, no excess motion like scratching ortrainee in a constant state of frustration; he must
adjusting one's uniform. This was a militaryalways have someone to better. The
discipline meant to challenge the student's willego-controlled trainee always has himself to
power. Where ju-jutsu forced us to analyze howbetter; so that, although he may get frustrated
a technique worked (or, frustrated, give up onalso, he will not become destructive or belligerent.
analysis altogether, hoping to subconsciouslyHis goal is not to beat somebody else but to
absorb the technique), karate dared us tomaster himself.
discipline ourselves using techniques as theA lack of combative balance is the outstanding
instruments of self-discipline. We gained power bycharacteristic of all budo entities. Combative
repetition, form by imitation; this was abalance is established and maintained by attaining
combination of the judo and ju-jutsu approaches.expertise in a wise range of weapons and
There was little explanation, however, and fewfamiliarity with other martial systems. But the
interesting drills. Then my teacher changedeffects of peace in the Edo period eventually
somewhat and added a little of both. I did noteroded this sense of practical realism (Donn
know if this was because we were no longerDraeger, Classical Budo, Weatherhill Publishing,
beginners or because sensei was getting soft. But1973).
when Sensei's cousin Elliot was graded to shodanIt is ironic that the same styles of martial arts
(first degree black belt), I found out that ourwhich claim to be combatively superior are those
school was not to be lost to traditions ofstyles which do not recognize or become
militarism, repetition, and imitation for long. Elliotproficient at other martial systems. A second
was the drill-sergeant, while sensei was theirony is that those systems which do try to
teacher. Elliot had us repeat exactly the thingsintegrate other martial teachings may claim to be
which he himself had to repeat as a novice.superior because of this, but they neglect to
Sensei had us try things which he had not beenrecognize many non-physical advantages of more
allowed to try as a novice. Sensei created; Elliotconservative systems.
repeated.Great modern exponents like Jigoro KANO
When I earned my shodan, sensei asked me to(1860-1938) and Gichin FUNAKOSHI (1868-1957)
teach a few classes as well. I was nobelieved in a well-balanced system of training with
drill-sergeant, so I left that to Elliot. I did not thinkrespect for all types of techniques, but their
it was my place to invent new exercises, so I leftfollowers either never completely understood their
that to sensei. What I did was to explain andintentions (despite their writing on the subject) or
analyze. I brought an intellectual approach to thecompletely ignored them. Thus Kanoís
lessons which the students appreciated sincejudo became known as a totally defensive art
previously they had been using their muscles, theirand later as a non-self-defense sport. Funakoshi's
emotional strengths, but not their thinkingShotokan karate became known as only a
machines. Our dojo represented all three majorkick-punch art without grappling or throws and
teaching methods in three separate teachers. Elliotlater as a very regimented sport-form. Both Kano
challenged us physically and drilled proper techniqueand Funakoshi wanted spiritual development (their
into us; sensei made it possible for us to use thatprime goal) and self defense ability. Ironically, what
technique in new and different ways; and Ijudo and Japanese karate are known for today is
explained movements technically and gave anot primarily either of these qualities even though
purpose to each new drill. One methodthe techniques which comprise them can easily be
complemented the others.taught as self-defense and the founders' moral
There are many approaches to teaching a style,principles can easily be taken as guidelines to
and none of the above methods by itself ischaracter development.
wrong or right. One method may be perfect toIn old, classical bu-jutsu, the prime goal was
attain one concept of "the ideal student", but it iscombat effectiveness; although, because of the
difficult if not impossible to integrate all theJapanese character, discipline and morals were
methods and each type of ideal into a programconsidered important in training as secondary
intended to produce the complete martial artist,characteristics of the warrior. In later budo,
an holistic ideal. However, I think the attempt iscombat-training was considered unnecessary. The
worth the effort. Too often teachers who claimemphasis switched to morals, with discipline an
their students will becomeaesthetic form considered additional attributes for
completely-integrated-artists-possessing-all-talentswhich a student should strive.
use only one method to attain this goal. FewThis misunderstandings which have produced
teachers want to admit that they have a limitedtoday's inherited methods of teaching have also
ideal; fighting ability, for instance, but notblinded the adherents to the fact that they are
character; tournament ability, but not self-control;not necessarily ancient ways of teaching. The
self-defense ability, but not artistry.present generation of practitioners often believes
It is a mixed method which I tried to bring to mythat what it practices has been handed down to it
own dojo. I not only combined methods but alsorelatively unchanged form classical periods. This is
emphases. In judo, I taught competitive techniquesimply untrue.
as well as classical ones. In aiki-ju-jutsu, I taughtToday, many styles of martial arts are trying to
hard, fast, slow, soft, strikes, locks, throws,recapture the aesthetics of old budo and the
takedowns, etc. And in karate, I emphasized katacombat effectiveness of old bu-jutsu. The goal is
sometimes, sparring other times, personallyan honorable one, but too often this is done
developed techniques at other times. I evenwithout an attempt to also change the "traditional"
taught aiki-principles as applied to the "harder"method of teaching.
karate. I acknowledged to my students my debt